The proportion of people who acted pro-socially.
How frequently people gave.
Share of donations.
Donations as a proportion of income.
Reasons for giving or not giving money.
The causes people support.
Types of charities supported.
Perceived impact of charities. 
How people discover charities.
How much the public trusts charities.
How charities could encourage more giving.
Frequency of volunteering, per person.
Opportunities to make change. 
Government encouragement.
More about our partner.
VISIT THE CAF WEBSITE
VISIT THE CAF WEBSITE

Finland

Insights from

View in English

Suomessa lahjoitushalukkuus on alhaisempi kuin Euroopassa ja maailmassa keskimäärin, mutta samaan aikaan suomalaiset lahjoittavat aktiivisesti järjestöille. Lahjoituksia ohjaa kansallinen lainsäädäntö, joka – yhdessä lupamenettelyn kanssa – rajoittaa lahjoituksia pyytävien tahojen määrää. Toisaalta pienimuotoiset keräykset ovat laajentaneet varainhankintamahdollisuuksia.

Lahjoitusten motiivit ovat samankaltaisia ​​kuin muualla maailmassa. Suomalaiset mainitsevat kuitenkin taloudelliset rajoitteet ja luottamuksen puutteen syiksi sille, miksi he eivät lahjoita useammin kuin sekä eurooppalaiset että globaalit kilpailijansa. Kasvupotentiaalia on, mutta epävarmuus lahjoitusten käytöstä ja yksittäisten toimijoiden epäeettisten toimien vaikutukset muualla alalla heikentävät lahjoitushalukkuutta. Tunnetut kansalliset järjestöt vetoavat lahjoittajiin, sillä ne tavoittavat suuren yleisön ja niitä pidetään luotettavina.

Tulokset osoittavat tietämättömyyttä: monet eivät ole tietoisia järjestöjen työn vaikutuksista tai omista osallistumismahdollisuuksistaan. Tämä korostaa tarvetta viestiä vaikuttavuudesta ja osallistumiskeinoista. Myös julkishallinnon kannustimia tulisi kehittää. Suomi eroaa muista maista esimerkiksi lahjoitusten verovähennysoikeuden osalta.

In Finland, willingness to donate is lower than the European and global average, but at the same time Finns actively donate to organisations. Donations are guided by national legislation, which — along with the licensing procedure — limits the number of parties requesting donations. On the other hand, small-scale collections have expanded the possibilities for fundraising.

Motivations for donating are similar to those around the world. However, Finns cite financial constraints and a lack of trust as reasons for not donating more often than both their European and global counterparts. There is growth potential, but uncertainty about the use of donations and the impact of unethical actions by individual actors elsewhere in the sector weaken the willingness to donate. Well-known national organisations appeal to donors, as they reach large audiences and are perceived as trustworthy.

The results show a lack of awareness: many are not aware of the impacts of organisations' work or their own opportunities to participate. This highlights the need to communicate about impact and ways to participate. Public administration incentives should also be developed. Finland differs from other countries, for example, in terms of the right to tax deductions on donations.

Pia Tornikoski
Secretary General
Responsible Donation VaLa ry (Finnish Fundraising Association)

Data from

Finland

EXPLORING: Generosity

1

The proportion of people who acted pro-socially.

During 2025, did you do any of the following?

Give money (by any means)
Finland
(2025)
Global average
Continent average
Finland
(2024)
Give money to a religious organisation or for a religious cause
Give money to a person or family in need (not including friends or family)
Give money to charity
Do unpaid, voluntary work either in your community or further afield.
Give goods to a charity or person / family in need (not including your family or friends)
All respondents — see here for sample sizes

2

How frequently people gave.

How often did you give money away in 2025, either to charity, a person or family in need, or to a religious organisation?

Finland
(2025)
Global average
Continent average
Finland
(2024)
All respondents who gave money through one or more of the three routes — see here for sample sizes

3

Share of donations.

The share of the value of all donations made in 2025, across the three different routes.

To religion
To charity
Direct to people in need
Global average
Continent average
All respondents who gave money through one or more of the three routes — see here for sample sizes. NB figures in bars may not sum to 100% due to rounding.

4

Donations as a proportion of income.

The average proportion of income people gave to each of the three donation routes, and overall.

% of income that went to charity
% of income that went to a person or family in need (not including friends or family in need)
% of income that went to a religious organisation or for a religious cause
Global average
Continent average
All respondents (i.e. calculations include those who donated zero). NB we’ve chosen to show figures to one decimal place to avoid estimates appearing more accurate than sample sizes can support. — see here for sample sizes

5 & 6

Reasons for giving or not giving money.

What would you say are the main reasons that you gave / did not give money away in 2025?

Finland
(2025)
Global average
Continent average
Finland
(2024)
View
Chart 5 = All respondents who gave money in 2025 / Chart 6 = All respondents who did not give money in 2025 — see here for sample sizes

EXPLORING: Behaviours and attitudes towards charities

7

The causes people support.

Which cause(s) did you donate to / do unpaid voluntary work for in 2025?

Sort by highest
Volunteered for...
Donated to...
Sort by highest
Volunteered for...
Donated to...
All respondents who gave money / volunteered in 2025 — see here for sample sizes

8

Types of charities supported.

Of the total value of your donations to charities in 2025, approximately how much went to each of the following?

To charities that work locally
To charities that work across the whole country
To charities that work in many countries around the world
All respondents who gave money in 2025 — see here for sample sizes

9

Perceived impact of charities.

To what extent, if at all, have charities had a positive or negative impact in your local community, or have they made no difference?

A very positive impact
A fairly positive impact
No difference
A fairly negative impact
A very negative impact
Impossible to tell
All respondents — see here for sample sizes

10

How people discover charities.

For the last charity that you gave money to, how did you first find out about them?

Finland
(2025)
Global average
Continent average
Finland
(2024)
All respondents who gave money to charity in 2025 — see here for sample sizes

11

How much the public trusts charities.

How trustworthy do you tend to find each of these types of charities?

Local / regional charities
National charities
International charities
Not at all trustworthy Very trustworthy
Not at all trustworthy Very trustworthy
All respondents — see here for sample sizes

12

How charities could encourage more giving.

How could charities encourage you to donate in 2026?

Finland
Global average
Continent average
All respondents — see here for sample sizes

Exploring: Getting involved

13

Frequency of volunteering, per person.

Of the xx% that did unpaid, voluntary work in 2025 that benefitted people other than their family or friends, how many shifts did they do?

Finland
(2025)
Global average
Continent average
Finland
(2024)
Number of unpaid volunteering shifts in 2025
All respondents who did unpaid, voluntary work in 2025 — see here for sample sizes

14

Opportunities to make change.

Think about the opportunities you have to get involved in making positive changes to society (whether locally or further afield). Which best describes your perspective?

I have enough opportunities to get involved, and take them when I can
I would like to get more involved, but I don't know how
I would like to get more involved, but I don't have time
I am not interested in getting involved
Global average
Continent average
All respondents — see here for sample sizes

15

Government encouragement.

"The Government encourages people to give to charity." Do you...

Strongly agree
Agree
Neither agree nor disagree
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Don’t know
All respondents — see here for sample sizes

More about our partner.

Vastuullinen Lahjoittaminen VaLa ry (Finnish Fundraising Association) is a politically and religiously independent association whose members are non-profit organisations.

VaLa's mission is to define the values and principles of responsible fundraising, to promote the professionalism and good governance of fundraising in non-profit organisations, and to engage in advocacy work in Finnish society and international networks in the field, promoting a strong donation culture. VaLa's member organisations represent approximately one million donors and supporters.

VaLa is a network of non-profit organisations who share the ideals of:

- Good governance and accountability of fundraising entities.
- Excellent expertise and ethics of the fundraising profession.
- A strong donation culture in Finnish society.
- Citizens' strong trust in community fundraising.

SHARE